RRML - Bone status and aortic calcifications in chondrocalcinosis patients

ISSN online: 2284-5623

ISSN-L: 1841-6624

Rejection rate (2020): 75%

Română English

Journal Metrics

Impact Factor 0.5
Five Year Impact Factor 0.5
JCI 0.12

Advanced search

Top 10 downloaded articles
- March 2024 -
Tissue protection immunohistoc... 1
Interdisciplinary correlations... 1
Phenotypic and genotypic metho... 1
Comparison of Total Bilirubin ... 1
Implications of visfatin genet... 1
A rare case of acute myeloid l... 1
HBV genotypes circulation in p... 1
Characterization of antibiotic... 1
Total Errors of TSH results by... 1
Evaluation of Plasma AA/DHA+EP... 1

Log in

Concept, Design & Programming
Dr. Adrian Man

Nr. 28(2)/2020 DOI:10.2478/rrlm-2020-0019

Research article

Bone status and aortic calcifications in chondrocalcinosis patients

Paulina Vele, Ciprian Nicolae Silaghi, Laura Otilia Damian, Siao-Pin Simon, Alexandra Craciun, Simona Rednic

Correspondence should be addressed to: Paulina Vele


Aim: We aimed to examine the association between several circulating bone turnover markers [ osteocalcin (OC), osteoprotegerin (OPG), beta-CrossLaps (β-CTx)], hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD) and abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) in patients with chondrocalcinosis (CC). Methods: Thirty-six patients with CC and thirty-seven controls were consecutively enrolled in this pilot case-control, cross-sectional study. The following parameters were assessed: serum levels of OC, OPG and β-CTx by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); hip and spine BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and AAC score by lateral radiography. Results: Patients with CC had higher levels of serum bone turnover markers and AAC score than the control group: OC [6.5 (3.5-9.9) vs 4.5 (2.6-7.2) ng/ml; p=0.05], OPG [(7.7 (6.2-9.4) vs 6.5 (5.5-8.12) pmol/ml; p=0.02], β-CTx [6078 (5870-6171) vs 5851 (5465-6109) pg/ml; p=0.02] and AAC score (3.6±6.2 vs 0.5±2; p=0.006). Conversely, even if statistical significance was not reached, hip and spine BMD was lower in patients with CC. Additionally, we found a positive correlation between OPG and AAC, but also between OPG and osteoporosis in patients with CC. Conclusion: Patients with CC are characterized by higher circulating OC, OPG and β-CTx. The presence of AAC was more common in patients with CC, being only associated with serum OPG.

Keywords: chondrocalcinosis, osteocalcin, osteoprotegerin, beta cross laps, abdominal aortic calcifications

Received: 25.11.2019
Accepted: 19.2.2020
Published: 5.3.2020

  PDF Download full text PDF
(417 KB)
How to cite
Vele P, Silaghi CN, Damian LO, Simon SP, Craciun A, Rednic S. Bone status and aortic calcifications in chondrocalcinosis patients. Rev Romana Med Lab. 2020;28(2):195-204. DOI:10.2478/rrlm-2020-0019