 |
|
- Main page
- News
- RJLabM Credits
- Archive
- Instructions for authors
- Online applications
- Editorial
- About us
-
Links
- Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
- Acta Marisiensis Seria Medica
- Bacteriologia, Virusologia, Parazitologia, Epidemiologia
- Biochemia Medica
- Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
- Clinical Chemistry
- Clinica Chimica Acta
- Documenta Haematologica
- Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology
- Biostatistics and web search strategies (Romanian)
- How to spot a statistical problem
- Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature
ISSN online: 2284-5623
ISSN-L: 1841-6624
Rejection rate (2020): 75%
Journal Metrics
Impact Factor 0.5 Five Year Impact Factor 0.5 JCI 0.12
Log in
Concept, Design & Programming
Dr. Adrian Man
Research article Pilot study on laboratory sample exchange: Evaluation and key findings Oana Roxana Oprea, Diana Ionela Handolescu, Minodora Dobreanu
Correspondence should be addressed to: Diana Ionela Handolescu
Abstract: Background: External quality control is a critical component of laboratory medicine, ensuring the accuracy, reliability, and comparability of test results across different laboratories and over time. This study aimed to evaluate the feasability of implementing a split-sample pilot exchange program involving multiple laboratories in Romania. Methods: The program involved six rounds of a split-sample protocol between 34 public and private Romanian laboratories, including four basic chemistry parameters: glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL-cholesterol. Performance was evaluated with traditional assessment methods, including Z-scores and performance specifications derived from biological variation. Results were analyzed to determine compliance with acceptable limits and performance metrics. Results: Overall, most laboratories achieved satisfactory results when assessed using mean ±3 standard deviations, particularly for total cholesterol and triglycerides. However, a significant number of laboratories failed to meet optimal Total Allowable Error (TAE) limits for glucose and HDL-cholesterol. While glucose showed satisfactory minimum TAE performance, many laboratories reported values above clinical decision thresholds. Similar trends were observed for HDL-cholesterol, where a notable proportion of laboratories did not meet optimal TAE specifications. These findings suggest that relying solely on Z-scores may be inadequate for performance evaluation. Conclusions: More stringent performance criteria are warranted to identify areas for improvement, ensuring consistent and reliable laboratory results that can accurately inform clinical decisions across participating laboratories. This could facilitate better identification of corrective actions. Keywords: ISO 17043, performance evaluation, proficiency testing, Z-score
Received: 6.2.2025 |
|||||
|
Download full text PDF (517 KB) |
||||
|
Oprea OR, Handolescu DI, Dobreanu M. Pilot study on laboratory sample exchange: Evaluation and key findings. Rev Romana Med Lab. 2025;33(2):119-24. DOI:10.2478/rrlm-2025-0012
|
|||||