RRML - The evaluation of the reverse algorithm for syphilis screening in blood donors

ISSN online: 2284-5623

ISSN-L: 1841-6624

Rejection rate (2016): 55%

Română English

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Advanced search

Top 10 downloaded articles
- December 2019 -
Romanian Review of Laboratory ... 13
Undetectable hemoglobin in a p... 6
Hemolysis has no influence on ... 6
The angiotensinogen gene polym... 4
Acute effects of recreational ... 3
The usefulness of neutrophil/l... 3
The influence of hemodialysis ... 3
The role of neutrophil to lymp... 3
The role of inflammation and C... 2
To translate or not to transla... 2

Log in

Concept, Design & Programming
Dr. Adrian Man

Nr. 27(4)/2019 DOI:10.2478/rrlm-2019-0039

Research article

The evaluation of the reverse algorithm for syphilis screening in blood donors

Rukiye Berkem, Ayşe Esra Karakoç

Correspondence should be addressed to: Rukiye Berkem


Background: In Turkey, prior to transfusion and apheresis, it is mandatory to screen blood for HBsAg, anti-HCV, anti-HIV 1/2, and syphilis. In recent years, efforts have been made to create effective diagnostic algorithms for screening, and as a screening strategy, many countries have switched from traditional algorithms to reverse algorithms. This study was carried out to evaluate the results we obtained after changing to chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) based reverse algorithm, which is more sensitive and specific than the traditional algorithm and VDRL test we currently use for syphilis screening. Methods: The screening algorithm was initiated with the treponemal CLIA method. The reactive samples were tested using a nontreponemal test VDRL and a second treponemal test TPHA. In the descriptive analyses, the averages, numbers, and percentage distributions were calculated. The group comparisons were undertaken with the chi-square test, accepting p < 0.05 as statistically significant. Results: Of the 5,053 samples that were tested with CLIA syphilis TPA assay 5,043 were negative (99.802%) and 10 were positive reactive (0.198%), and the difference between the two was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Ten samples that were recurrently reactive were analyzed by VDRL and TPHA tests simultaneously. VDRL was negative in all 10 samples, whereas TPHA was negative in one sample, but positive in nine samples at a titer of ≥1/160. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, we decided to use the CLIA method and reverse algorithm instead of using the traditional algorithm and VDRL as the initial screening method.

Keywords: blood donors, syphilis screening tests, confirmation, reverse algorithm

Received: 11.4.2019
Accepted: 30.9.2019
Published: 12.10.2019

  PDF Download full text PDF
(393 KB)
How to cite
Berkem R, Karakoç AE. The evaluation of the reverse algorithm for syphilis screening in blood donors. Rev Romana Med Lab. 2019;27(4):383-8. DOI:10.2478/rrlm-2019-0039