RRML - Comparison of four chromatographic methods used for measurement of glycated hemoglobin
AMLR

ISSN online: 2284-5623

ISSN-L: 1841-6624

Rejection rate (2020): 75%

Română English


Journal Metrics

Impact Factor 0.493
Five Year Impact Factor 0.531
SNIP 0.373
JCI 0.17


Advanced search


Top 10 downloaded articles
- December 2022 -
 
Downregulation of hsa-miR-4328... 5
Normality assessment, few para... 4
High DNAJA4 expression correla... 4
Setting up an own laboratory p... 4
New Para-Clinical Investigatio... 3
Genetic risk factors for throm... 3
miR-190, CDK1, MCM10 and NDC80... 3
The relationship between matri... 2
A model for calculating measur... 2
The Use of Infrared Spectrosco... 2

Log in

Concept, Design & Programming
Dr. Adrian Man

   
 
Nr. 24(4)/2016 DOI:10.1515/rrlm-2016-0039
XML
TXT

Research article

Comparison of four chromatographic methods used for measurement of glycated hemoglobin

Enikő Nemes-Nagy, Zita Fazakas, Victor Balogh-Sămărghițan, Zsuzsánna Simon-Szabó, Lóránd Dénes, Cosmina Cristina Uzun, Márta Andrea Fodor, Mariana Cornelia Tilinca, Deborah Reid, Trefor Higgins

Correspondence should be addressed to: Mariana Cornelia Tilinca

Abstract:

This parameter’s results accuracy has a special importance in the management of diabetic patients since targets for optimal glycemic control are established using HbA1c values. Several error sources can influence the obtained value, some of them can be counteracted (ex. pipetting errors, storage), and others should be taken into consideration at the interpretation of the result (ex. presence of hemoglobin variants). The aim of this study was to compare four chromatographic methods regarding the costs and the influence of certain error sources on the accuracy of the result. Materials and methods: Samples and controls were analyzed using Variant I, Micromat II and In2it (Bio-Rad) systems, and the BIOMIDI reagent kit for HbA1c measurement. Results: Positive correlation could be observed comparing the results obtained using different methods, except the patients presenting elevated HbF. Pipetting errors modify the results up to 5% in case of Variant I, and up to 10% in case of Micromat II in the tested range. One day of improper storage at room temperature causes 3% deviation from the actual value using the Variant I analyzer and 5% in case of Micromat II and In2it equipment. As a conclusion, depending on the number of samples, automated chromatographic analyzers are the most appropriate equipments for the determination of HbA1c.

Keywords: glycated hemoglobin; high pressure liquid chromatography; hemoglobin variants; method comparison; error sources

Received: 21.2.2016
Accepted: 10.10.2016
Published: 9.11.2016

 
  PDF Download full text PDF
(416 KB)
     
 
How to cite
Nemes-Nagy E, Fazakas Z, Balogh-Sămărghițan V, Simon-Szabó Z, Dénes L, Uzun CC, et al. Comparison of four chromatographic methods used for measurement of glycated hemoglobin. Rev Romana Med Lab. 2016;24(4):431-9. DOI:10.1515/rrlm-2016-0039