RRML - Co-expression of the CBFβ-MYH11 and BCR-ABL fusion genes in chronic myeloid leukaemia
AMLR

ISSN online: 2284-5623

ISSN-L: 1841-6624

Rejection rate (2020): 75%

Română English


Journal Metrics

Impact Factor 0.493
Five Year Impact Factor 0.531
SNIP 0.373
JCI 0.17


Advanced search


Top 10 downloaded articles
- December 2022 -
 
Downregulation of hsa-miR-4328... 5
Normality assessment, few para... 4
High DNAJA4 expression correla... 4
Setting up an own laboratory p... 4
New Para-Clinical Investigatio... 3
Genetic risk factors for throm... 3
miR-190, CDK1, MCM10 and NDC80... 3
The relationship between matri... 2
A model for calculating measur... 2
The Use of Infrared Spectrosco... 2

Log in

Concept, Design & Programming
Dr. Adrian Man

   
 
Nr. 23(2)/2015 DOI:10.1515/rrlm-2015-0013
XML
TXT

Co-expression of the CBFβ-MYH11 and BCR-ABL fusion genes in chronic myeloid leukaemia

Roxana Popescu, Angela Dăscălescu, Cătălin Dănăilă, Doramina Ghiorghiu, Mihaela Zlei, Anca Ivanov, Adriana Sireteanu, Eusebiu Vlad Gorduza, Doina Azoicăi


Abstract:

The coexistence of t(9;22) and inv(16) has been described in a very limited number of cases of CML, de novo or therapy-related AML. We report a patient with CML who presented both inversion of chromosome 16 and Philadelphia chromosome and evolved towards the blast phase under treatment with Imatinib. Laboratory diagnosis and monitoring was made by flow cytometry, conventional cytogenetics and molecular genetics techniques. The inv(16), detected by karyotyping in the Philadelphia chromosome positive clone at the moment of the blast transformation, was retrospectively assessed by means of real-time PCR, and was proved to have been present since diagnosis. The bone marrow biopsy performed in the blast phase of CML confirmed the presence of blasts belonging to the myeloid lineage, with indications of monocytic differentiation, frequently associated with inv(16). Moreover, the case also associated a F359V tyrosine kinase domain mutation, resulting in intermediate resistance to Imatinib and Nilotinib, which imposed therapy-switch to Dasatinib. In our case the evolution was progressive, followed by death due to lack of response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, 18 months after diagnosis. The coexistence of t(9;22) and inv(16) in CML seems to be associated with an aggressive clinical evolution and resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Due to the very small number of cases described in literature, therapeutic decisions are still difficult for patients displaying these abnormalities.

Keywords: chronic myeloid leukaemia, Philadelphia chromosome, inv(16), tyrosine kinase domain mutation

Received: 12.11.2014
Accepted: 13.4.2015
Published: 29.4.2015

 
  PDF Download full text PDF
(1046 KB)
     
 
How to cite
Popescu R, Dăscălescu A, Dănăilă C, Ghiorghiu D, Zlei M, Ivanov A, et al. Co-expression of the CBFβ-MYH11 and BCR-ABL fusion genes in chronic myeloid leukaemia. Rev Romana Med Lab. 2015;23(2):221-30. DOI:10.1515/rrlm-2015-0013